Well, it probably wouldn't be that useful as different parts of the
piece are more dense than others and they already max out my CPU in
realtime with ksmps=1 using 32 bit.  So it'd just bee 100% for both.
=)

steven

On 11/8/05, Iain Duncan <iainduncan@telus.net> wrote:
>
> > I will try a test tonight of my current piece I am working on.  The
> > piece does not use convolution, and when rendering to disk I use
> > 44100, 16bit, ksmps=1.  I will record the time taken to render the
> > piece for both 64 and 32.  The piece is only a sketch but is ten
> > minutes in duration with a fair amount going on, so should be a decent
> > test I think.
> >
> > steven
>
> Steven, could you also if possible do a realtime output cpu use
> comparison? I would be interested to hear the difference.
>
> Thanks
> Iain
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
> it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
> Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
> _______________________________________________
> Csound-devel mailing list
> Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel
>


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Csound-devel mailing list
Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net