Yes there is. You can use includes for macros too. It would just be
nice if they would autoload like abstractions in Pd. If it's not so
straightforward to implement then there is no point in wasting time on
it but if it it easy to implement I think it would be a nice feature.

Rory.


2008/12/6 Jonatan Liljedahl <lijon@kymatica.com>:
> Is there any "include" functionality in the orchestra? Then one could
> just include the file with the UDO's (include would then look in
> OPCODEDIR, the dir of the orchestra, the current work directory, etc).
> If any UDO uses another UDO they would also use "include" and there
> would be no need to handle dependencies explicitly.
>
> Anthony Kozar wrote:
>> Dependencies would seem to really complicate the idea of automatically
>> loading UDOs.  I suggest that we not implement the UDODIR idea without a
>>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you.  Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Csound-devel mailing list
Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net