On Wednesday 26 March 2008 20:58:17 Steven Yi wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> I think this would be very useful work, but also have a hard time
> visualizing at the moment.  I think it might be useful if you were
> commit your work early but under a different name, SConstruct2
> perhaps, so that we could see in code what you are working on and also
> to see how this would impact development going forward.  Plus we could
> switch between the current build file and the SConstruct2 file using
> -f, which would be good for testing.

Good idea. This file would of course start as a copy of SConstruct (starting 
from scratch would require much more work, and probably involve rediscovering 
problems with different platforms).


>
> Are you planning SConscript files for each library then?  (If so, I
> think that would be a very good thing.)

No. It's one SConscript for each folder. This way all related stuff is 
together in a SConscript (for example, all opcodes, because they build more 
or less the same way).



-- 
Felipe Sateler