Re: [Csnd] [EXTERNAL] [Csnd] Syncgrain Question
Date | 2022-10-29 01:28 |
From | Scott Daughtrey |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] [EXTERNAL] [Csnd] Syncgrain Question |
Art has probably already figured this out but as one who always appreciates seeing a solution to questions asked on the forum, Victor's suggestion, the fof opcode, seems to offer one viable solution, depending on one's expectations or usage needs. |
Date | 2022-10-29 08:35 |
From | Oeyvind Brandtsegg |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] [EXTERNAL] [Csnd] Syncgrain Question |
Partikkel will of course do this nicely.... lør. 29. okt. 2022, 02:28 skrev Scott Daughtrey <stunes6556@gmail.com>: Art has probably already figured this out but as one who always appreciates seeing a solution to questions asked on the forum, Victor's suggestion, the fof opcode, seems to offer one viable solution, depending on one's expectations or usage needs. |
Date | 2022-10-29 09:24 |
From | Victor Lazzarini |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] [EXTERNAL] [Csnd] Syncgrain Question |
yes, I just did not suggest because there was a request to avoid complexity. Partikkel would do anything in granular synthesis. Prof. Victor Lazzarini
Maynooth University
Ireland
On 29 Oct 2022, at 08:37, Oeyvind Brandtsegg <obrandts@gmail.com> wrote:
|